
The Super High Roller Bowl XI 2026 results delivered one of the most dramatic comebacks of the high-stakes poker season, as Brandon Wilson survived a dangerous money-bubble situation before defeating an elite final table to win $1,125,000.
The American professional entered the final day behind Alex Foxen, Nick Petrangelo, and Adrian Mateos. However, a crucial double-up against Foxen completely changed the championship battle.
Wilson went on to eliminate several of his toughest opponents before facing Petrangelo heads-up for the title.
Then came the final hand.
Petrangelo attempted a massive three-street bluff with pocket sevens. Wilson called on the flop, called again on the turn, and completed a queen-high straight on the river.
When Petrangelo moved all-in, Wilson called instantly to secure the championship.
The victory earned Wilson his sixth PokerGO Tour title, 400 PGT points, and the largest first-place prize of his career.
However, the most extraordinary part of the story is what happened before he reached the money.
With six players remaining and only five guaranteed a payout, Wilson came dangerously close to elimination. A favorable river card kept his tournament alive and helped produce an unforgettable turnaround.
Here is the complete final table breakdown, the defining hands, and the strategic lessons behind Wilson’s Super High Roller Bowl XI victory.
Super High Roller Bowl XI 2026 Results: Final Table Payouts
The $100,000 buy-in Super High Roller Bowl XI attracted 28 entries at the PokerGO Studio in Las Vegas.
Consequently, the tournament generated a $2.8 million prize pool, with the top five finishers receiving payouts.
De acordo com o official PokerGO Tour results, Brandon Wilson collected the $1,125,000 first-place prize after defeating Nick Petrangelo.
Complete Super High Roller Bowl XI Final Table Results
| Lugar | Jogador | Country | Prêmio | PGT Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1º | Brandon Wilson | United States | $1,125,000 | 400 |
| 2º | Nick Petrangelo | United States | $700,000 | 210 |
| 3º | Alex Foxen | United States | $450,000 | 135 |
| 4º | Jeremy Ausmus | United States | $310,000 | 93 |
| 5º | Adrian Mateos | Espanha | $215,000 | 65 |
All five finalists earned substantial payouts. However, the difference between finishing first and second was particularly significant.
Wilson received $425,000 more than Petrangelo, making the final heads-up confrontation exceptionally valuable.
Furthermore, winning the championship meant adding another prestigious title to Wilson’s rapidly growing professional record.
The event also highlighted the continued popularity of elite buy-in tournaments, a development explored in our analysis of the high-stakes poker boom.
How Brandon Wilson Almost Bubbled a $100,000 Poker Tournament
The defining moment of Wilson’s championship run occurred before the five paid places had been decided.
Six players remained, meaning one competitor would leave without receiving a payout.
In a tournament where fifth place was worth $215,000, the financial difference between surviving and being eliminated was enormous.
Wilson faced Kristen Foxen in a critical hand and risked his tournament life while holding a drawing hand with an overcard.
Foxen held an overpair and was ahead with one card remaining.
However, Wilson improved on the river, allowing him to survive.
Instead of being eliminated just outside the money, he secured a crucial double-up that completely changed the table dynamics.
Why the Bubble Was So Important
The money bubble is the point at which the next eliminated player receives no prize while the remaining players secure payouts.
However, its strategic significance extends beyond simply reaching the money.
Players must consider the value of their tournament lives, the relative stack sizes, and the financial consequences of elimination.
For example, a decision that might be straightforward in a cash game can become considerably more complicated near a tournament bubble.
That is because tournament chips do not always translate directly into equal amounts of prize equity.
Nossa Guia de estratégia de jogo de bolhas explains how payout pressure influences decisions in these situations.
Kristen Foxen Finishes Sixth Without a Payout
After losing the critical hand to Wilson, Kristen Foxen was left with a short stack.
She soon faced Wilson again and committed her remaining chips with ace-eight.
However, Wilson held pocket nines and improved to a set on the flop.
Foxen was unable to recover and finished sixth, becoming the tournament’s official bubble finisher.
Consequently, the remaining five players secured at least $215,000.
Meanwhile, Wilson advanced to the final day with 1,270,000 chips.
The elimination demonstrated how quickly a high-stakes tournament can change.
Just moments earlier, Wilson faced the possibility of missing the money entirely. Instead, he had survived and was still competing for the $1.125 million first-place prize.
The Brutal One-Outer That Also Hurt the Foxens
Kristen Foxen’s elimination was not the only dramatic hand involving the Foxen family during the tournament.
Alex Foxen also suffered a remarkable bad beat against Nick Petrangelo while the event approached the money.
Foxen held pocket tens against Petrangelo’s pocket sixes in a major preflop confrontation.
However, another six had already been folded, leaving Petrangelo with just one immediate card capable of giving him a set.
The board ran out:
A♠ 9♠ 9♦ 6♦ 7♠
The six on the turn gave Petrangelo a full house, allowing him to win the hand despite entering the confrontation far behind.
According to PokerNews’ breakdown of the extraordinary hand, the result had important consequences for both Alex and Kristen Foxen.
Alex still had enough chips to remain a major contender. However, the outcome also affected Kristen’s chances of surviving the bubble.
For poker fans, the hand was another reminder that even overwhelming favorites can lose when the remaining cards are dealt.
Why One-Outers Attract So Much Attention
In poker, an out is a card that can improve a player’s hand enough to win, assuming no further developments change the outcome.
A one-outer is a situation in which a player has only one available card that can produce the necessary improvement at that point in the hand.
Such situations are uncommon, particularly when players have already committed large portions of their stacks.
However, unlikely outcomes remain possible.
The relevant lesson is that probability describes what should happen over many comparable situations, not what must happen in one individual hand.
Understanding that distinction is essential to making better decisions.
Nossa guia de pot odds explains how players can evaluate risk and probability without becoming overly focused on individual outcomes.
Alex Foxen Starts the Final Day as Chip Leader
Despite the difficult hands involving his wife and Petrangelo, Alex Foxen remained in a strong position entering the final day.
In fact, he controlled more than one-third of the chips in play.
The five finalists returned with the following chip counts:
| Rank | Jogador | Fichas Iniciais |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alex Foxen | 2,870,000 |
| 2 | Nick Petrangelo | 1,680,000 |
| 3 | Adrian Mateos | 1,510,000 |
| 4 | Brandon Wilson | 1,270,000 |
| 5 | Jeremy Ausmus | 1,070,000 |
Foxen entered the finale with more than twice Wilson’s stack.
Therefore, Wilson needed to make significant progress before he could realistically challenge for the title.
However, one confrontation would soon change the entire leaderboard.
The Ace-King vs Pocket Tens Hand That Changed Everything
One of the most important hands at the final table involved Brandon Wilson and Alex Foxen.
Wilson held ace-king, while Foxen held pocket tens.
After a series of preflop raises, the players committed Wilson’s remaining stack.
Foxen had an opportunity to eliminate one of his closest competitors and strengthen his chip lead.
However, the board delivered an ace for Wilson.
His top pair held through the remaining streets, securing a crucial double-up.
Consequently, Wilson climbed to approximately 2.455 million chips while Foxen fell to around 1.555 million.
The hand transformed Wilson from a dangerous short stack into a leading contender.
More importantly, it changed the strategic balance of the final table.
Why Ace-King Against Pocket Tens Was So Important
Ace-king against pocket tens is a common example of a preflop confrontation between two unpaired overcards and a medium-high pocket pair.
Although pocket tens begin ahead, ace-king has substantial equity because either an ace or king may help it improve.
However, the precise winning probabilities depend on the suits and card removal effects.
Therefore, such confrontations are often described as approximate coin flips rather than guaranteed wins for either player.
At the final table of a high-stakes tournament, the result can change far more than the chip counts.
Winning or losing a major all-in may dramatically affect a player’s chance of finishing in a higher-paying position.
For readers interested in those calculations, our guide to Independent Chip Model strategy explains why tournament decisions involve more than raw chip equity.
How Brandon Wilson Eliminated Adrian Mateos and Alex Foxen
Once Wilson became a major threat, the final table began moving quickly.
Adrian Mateos was the first player eliminated from the five-handed finale.
The Spanish professional, who has accumulated some of the largest tournament winnings in modern poker, finished fifth for $215,000.
Mateos’ elimination was especially notable because he entered the event following another extraordinary year on the international circuit.
Our earlier report on Adrian Mateos’ $6.37 million Triton victory provides additional context about his high-stakes achievements.
Meanwhile, Jeremy Ausmus was eliminated in fourth place for $310,000.
That left Wilson, Petrangelo, and Foxen competing for the championship.
Alex Foxen’s Pocket Sevens Run Into Pocket Eights
Another critical confrontation occurred when Foxen moved all-in holding pocket sevens.
However, Wilson had pocket eights and called.
Foxen needed to improve to survive, but the board produced another eight for Wilson.
Consequently, Wilson made a full house and eliminated Foxen in third place for $450,000.
The result was particularly dramatic because Foxen had entered the final day with the chip lead.
Instead of reaching the final heads-up match, he finished behind Wilson and Petrangelo.
Meanwhile, Wilson entered the championship showdown with a chip advantage.
Brandon Wilson vs Nick Petrangelo: The Final Heads-Up Battle
With Alex Foxen eliminated, Brandon Wilson and Nick Petrangelo remained to compete for the title.
Wilson began heads-up play with approximately 4.74 million chips.
Petrangelo held around 3.66 million.
Although Wilson had the lead, both players retained enough chips to play a competitive heads-up match.
Furthermore, Petrangelo brought substantial experience in elite tournament fields.
He had recently won a major Triton tournament and was attempting to add another prestigious high-roller title to his record.
However, Wilson maintained his advantage during the early heads-up action.
Then, the final hand developed into one of the most memorable confrontations of the event.
The Final Hand: Nick Petrangelo’s Pocket Sevens Bluff Fails
The decisive hand began with Wilson holding Q♠ T♠.
Petrangelo held 7♥ 7♦.
With the blinds at 30,000/60,000, Wilson opened from the button to 130,000.
Petrangelo responded with a three-bet to 500,000.
Wilson called, setting up a substantial pot before any community cards had been dealt.
Flop: A♦ Q♣ 9♠
The flop gave Wilson second pair with his queen.
Petrangelo still held pocket sevens, which were now behind Wilson’s pair of queens.
However, Petrangelo continued representing a strong hand and bet 500,000.
Wilson called.
At this point, Wilson did not hold a straight or a premium made hand.
Instead, he had a medium-strength pair facing aggression from an opponent who had already reraised before the flop.
The call kept the hand alive and forced Petrangelo to make another decision on the turn.
Turn: J♣
The jack changed the situation significantly.
Wilson now held an open-ended straight draw alongside his pair of queens.
An eight or a king could complete a straight.
However, Petrangelo continued the bluff, betting 650,000.
Wilson called again.
The developing hand had become extremely expensive for both players, and the final card would determine whether Wilson improved.
River: 8♥
The river delivered exactly the type of card Wilson needed.
With Q♠ T♠ in his hand and Q♣ 9♠ J♣ 8♥ among the community cards, Wilson completed a queen-high straight.
His five-card combination was:
8♥ 9♠ T♠ J♣ Q♠
However, Petrangelo continued his aggressive line.
He moved all-in for approximately 1.325 million chips, attempting to force Wilson to fold.
Wilson called immediately.
Petrangelo revealed his pocket sevens, which were no match for Wilson’s straight.
As a result, Wilson won the final pot, the championship trophy, and the $1,125,000 first-place prize.
Petrangelo finished runner-up for $700,000.
The hand was also examined in PokerNews’ championship report.
Was Petrangelo’s River Bluff a Bad Play?
The final result makes Petrangelo’s decision appear costly. However, judging a poker bluff requires more than knowing whether it succeeded.
A bluff attempts to make an opponent fold a stronger hand.
Therefore, its profitability depends on several factors, including the opponent’s range, previous betting action, bet size, and the likelihood of a fold.
Petrangelo had reraised before the flop and continued betting on three streets.
That sequence represented significant strength.
However, the river also completed several possible straight combinations.
For Wilson, holding queen-ten meant the final card produced a straight that comfortably beat Petrangelo’s actual hand.
Consequently, Petrangelo’s all-in bet failed.
Nevertheless, one unsuccessful bluff does not prove that every part of the line was strategically incorrect.
Evaluating that question properly requires considering the complete ranges and incentives of both players.
Nossa guia avançado de estratégia para o river explains how players distinguish value bets from bluffs in difficult situations.
What Does Wilson’s Call Teach About River Decisions?
Wilson’s final decision was straightforward because his straight was extremely strong against Petrangelo’s actual hand.
However, his earlier calls involved more uncertainty.
On the flop, Wilson held only second pair.
On the turn, he improved by adding a powerful drawing possibility.
These different stages illustrate why players should reconsider hand strength after every community card.
Furthermore, the complete betting sequence matters more than one isolated action.
Nossa guide to reviewing poker hands explains how players can analyze decisions without allowing the final result to distort their conclusions.
Who Is Brandon Wilson? The New Super High Roller Bowl XI Champion
Brandon Wilson is an American professional poker player from Chicago who has built an impressive record in elite tournament poker.
Although he is not as widely recognized by casual fans as some long-established poker personalities, his tournament results have placed him among the successful high-stakes professionals of recent years.
According to CardPlayer’s coverage of the championship, Wilson had already recorded several seven-figure tournament cashes before this victory.
However, those earlier million-dollar results came without a first-place finish worth at least seven figures.
His Super High Roller Bowl XI championship changed that.
Furthermore, the result represented Wilson’s sixth PokerGO Tour title.
He earned 400 PGT points for the victory and strengthened his position in the wider high-roller tournament scene.
Why This Victory Matters for His Career
Winning a prestigious championship against elite opponents provides a different level of recognition from simply recording a large tournament cash.
Wilson defeated a field containing experienced professionals with major titles and substantial career earnings.
Moreover, his path to victory included surviving difficult all-ins, recovering from a comparatively short stack, and defeating strong opponents at the final table.
The result therefore demonstrated both his tournament resilience and his ability to convert a deep run into a championship.
However, a single victory should not be treated as proof that any player will consistently win future high-stakes events.
Tournament poker remains highly variable, even among world-class professionals.
What Is the Super High Roller Bowl?
The Super High Roller Bowl is one of the most prestigious brands associated with high-stakes tournament poker.
Its events feature exceptionally large buy-ins and attract leading professional players from around the world.
Unlike large-field tournaments with thousands of entries, Super High Roller Bowl competitions can feature relatively small fields.
However, the average experience level of the participants is extremely high.
The 2026 Super High Roller Bowl XI featured 28 entries competing for a $2.8 million prize pool.
Meanwhile, other Super High Roller Bowl editions have used considerably larger buy-ins.
The tournament forms part of the PokerGO Tour’s broader high-stakes ecosystem.
Our article on one of the largest high-stakes poker pots explores a different part of poker’s biggest-money action.
However, large cash-game pots and tournament prize pools should not be compared as though they measure the same financial result.
How Much Did Brandon Wilson Actually Profit?
Wilson’s official first-place payout was $1,125,000.
However, a tournament payout is not automatically equivalent to net profit.
Players must account for their entry fees, potential re-entries, staking arrangements, taxes, and other applicable expenses.
For example, subtracting a single $100,000 entry from a $1,125,000 payout produces a difference of $1,025,000 before additional costs.
However, that is only an illustrative calculation.
It does not establish Wilson’s actual personal profit because his complete financial arrangements have not been independently verified here.
Moreover, high-stakes professionals sometimes sell portions of their tournament action to investors.
Therefore, the amount a player personally retains can differ significantly from the advertised prize.
Understanding that distinction is particularly important when evaluating poker’s largest tournament payouts.
Three Poker Strategy Lessons From Wilson’s Comeback
Most players will never enter a $100,000 tournament.
However, the decisions and situations surrounding Wilson’s victory illustrate principles relevant at many levels of competitive poker.
1. Tournament Survival Has Financial Value
When Wilson faced elimination near the bubble, the outcome determined whether he would continue fighting for the title or leave with nothing.
That situation demonstrates the importance of understanding payout pressure.
However, protecting tournament life does not mean avoiding every risky decision.
Instead, players need to evaluate how a possible chip gain compares with the cost of elimination.
This is the central idea behind tournament ICM.
2. A Chip Lead Can Disappear Quickly
Alex Foxen entered the final day with the largest stack by a considerable margin.
However, a major confrontation against Wilson reversed much of that advantage.
Later, Foxen was eliminated in third place.
Consequently, the result shows why chip leadership is not a guarantee of victory.
Even dominant stacks remain vulnerable to substantial pots and changing tournament dynamics.
3. Review Decisions, Not Just Results
Petrangelo’s failed river bluff ended his championship hopes.
However, players studying that hand should consider the complete betting sequence rather than simply labeling the final wager a mistake.
Likewise, Wilson’s successful calls deserve analysis of the information available at each stage.
The broader lesson is that disciplined decision-making matters more than trying to reproduce isolated winning hands.
Nossa poker mental game guide explores how experienced players approach both victories and defeats.
What Happens Next on the PokerGO Tour?
Following Super High Roller Bowl XI, the PokerGO Tour turns its attention to the Poker Masters.
The next series begins October 12 and continues through October 23.
It features multiple high-stakes No-Limit Hold’em tournaments before concluding with a $51,000 finale.
Furthermore, Wilson enters the festival with positive recent results.
He won the previous year’s $25,000 Poker Masters finale for $464,000.
However, repeating that success will require another series of strong performances against elite opposition.
Poker fans can follow official tournament results through the PokerGO Tour website.
Frequently Asked Questions About Super High Roller Bowl XI
Who won Super High Roller Bowl XI 2026?
Brandon Wilson won Super High Roller Bowl XI, defeating Nick Petrangelo heads-up to claim the $1,125,000 first-place prize and his sixth PokerGO Tour title.
How much did Brandon Wilson win?
Wilson received an official tournament payout of $1,125,000. That figure represents the prize awarded and does not establish his personal net profit after financial arrangements and expenses.
Who finished second in Super High Roller Bowl XI?
Nick Petrangelo finished second for $700,000 after losing the final heads-up confrontation against Wilson.
What happened to Alex Foxen?
Alex Foxen entered the final day as chip leader but lost a major all-in with pocket tens against Wilson’s ace-king. He was later eliminated in third place for $450,000.
Did Kristen Foxen cash in the tournament?
No. Kristen Foxen finished sixth, one position outside the five paid places. She was eliminated by Brandon Wilson after losing a critical confrontation near the money bubble.
How many players entered Super High Roller Bowl XI?
The tournament recorded 28 entries, generating a total prize pool of $2,800,000.
What was the Super High Roller Bowl XI buy-in?
The event was advertised as a $100,000 buy-in No-Limit Hold’em tournament. Additional administrative fees may be listed separately by tournament databases.
What was the final hand between Wilson and Petrangelo?
Wilson held Q♠ T♠ against Petrangelo’s 7♥ 7♦. The board ran A♦ Q♣ 9♠ J♣ 8♥, giving Wilson a queen-high straight. Petrangelo moved all-in on the river, and Wilson called to win the tournament.
How many PGT points did Brandon Wilson receive?
Wilson earned 400 PokerGO Tour points for winning the event.
Where was Super High Roller Bowl XI played?
The tournament took place at the PokerGO Studio at ARIA in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Final Thoughts: From the Bubble to a $1.125 Million Championship
Brandon Wilson’s victory at Super High Roller Bowl XI delivered everything that makes high-stakes tournament poker compelling.
There were dramatic all-ins, major financial consequences, experienced opponents, and a championship decided by a memorable river confrontation.
However, the defining part of Wilson’s performance was his ability to recover from a dangerous position.
With six players remaining, he was close to leaving the tournament without a payout.
Instead, he survived, helped eliminate Kristen Foxen, and returned for the final day with an opportunity to win the title.
Then came the critical ace-king confrontation against Alex Foxen, followed by further eliminations and a heads-up showdown with Nick Petrangelo.
Ultimately, Wilson completed a straight on the river and called Petrangelo’s final bluff to secure the $1,125,000 championship prize.
The victory also earned him his sixth PokerGO Tour title and reinforced his growing reputation among elite tournament professionals.
Super High Roller Bowl XI will be remembered for an extraordinary comeback: Brandon Wilson went from nearly missing the money to winning one of poker’s most prestigious high-stakes tournaments.
