Technical skills and strategic thinking in poker are demanding but one often overlooked aspect is ethics. A strong ethical foundation separates respected players from those merely tolerated at the tables. While poker’s competitive nature encourages deception within the game’s framework, certain behaviors cross into ethically questionable territory. This comprehensive guide explores poker’s unwritten ethical code, helping players navigate the sometimes blurry line between strategic play and unethical behavior.
Angle Shooting: The Ethical Gray Area
Perhaps no topic generates more debate in poker ethics than angle shooting—actions that technically stay within the rules but deliberately deceive opponents through unethical means.
Common Angle Shoots to Avoid
- Acting out of turn – Making a deliberate action when it’s not your turn to influence others
- Hidden chip stacks – Concealing large denomination chips to mislead opponents about your stack size
- String betting – Forward motion with chips separated into multiple movements to gauge reactions
- Verbal misrepresentations – Stating one action but claiming you said something else
- Pump fake betting – Making motions as if to bet without actually committing chips 1
While bluffing and deception are integral to ethics strategy, angle shooting violates the spirit of fair competition and damages the integrity of the game. Both written poker rules and unwritten etiquette rules define angle shooting as unacceptable. 1
The Reputation Cost
Tournament director Matt Savage explains: “Players who repeatedly angle shoot may not be breaking official rules, but they’re destroying their reputation. poker ethics is a community, and word travels fast. The short-term advantage gained is never worth the long-term cost to your reputation and opportunities.”
Slow Rolling: The Ultimate Disrespect
While not technically against official rules, slow rolling is considered one of the most disrespectful actions at the poker ethics table.
What Constitutes a Slow Roll
Slow rolling occurs when a player holding the nuts (or a hand that’s certainly winning) deliberately takes an extended time to reveal their cards at showdown, often to taunt their opponent or build unnecessary drama. 1
Examples of Slow Rolling
- Tanking before calling with the nuts when the decision should be obvious
- Slowly revealing cards one at a time when holding the winner
- Fake contemplation before turning over a dominating hand
- Suggesting you might fold when holding an unbeatable hand
Phil Hellmuth, known for his own occasional etiquette violations, nevertheless states: “There’s no excuse for slow rolling. It’s not strategy; it’s just being a jerk. You can bluff, you can play tough, but when the hand is over, show your cards with respect.”
Time Management and Table Courtesy
The pace of live poker ethics games depends on all players maintaining reasonable speed of play and attention to the action.
Expectations for Timely Play
- Staying focused on the game rather than phones or other distractions
- Pre-planning decisions when possible
- Appropriate tanking only when facing genuinely difficult decisions
- Prompt folding when not involved in a hand
- Being ready to act when the action reaches you 1
The Impact of Slow Play
Live poker ethics games typically see 25-30 hands per hour, but this pace slows dramatically when players are distracted by devices, conversations, or simply not paying attention. This behavior isn’t just annoying—it reduces everyone’s expected value by decreasing the total hands played in a session. 1
Hit and Run Ethics: The Controversial Exit
One of poker’s most debated ethical questions concerns leaving the game immediately after winning a significant pot.
The Ethical Debate
The “hit and run” occurs when a player wins a substantial pot and promptly leaves the game. While no official rule prohibits this practice, it’s widely considered poor etiquette as it denies others the opportunity to win their money back. 1
Related Ethical Violations
- Ratholing – Taking chips off the table to reduce exposure while continuing to play
- Selective table changes – Moving exclusively to avoid skilled players
- Chips in pocket – Removing chips from play without leaving the game
Professional cash game specialist Bart Hanson notes: “In a home game especially, leaving immediately after winning big violates an implicit understanding. In a casino, it’s less frowned upon but still considered somewhat disrespectful, particularly in regular games where players know each other.”
Verbal Declarations and Honesty
Verbal statements in poker ethics carry significant ethical weight, even when not technically binding according to house rules.
Ethical Verbal Conduct
- Honoring stated intentions even when not required by rules
- Clear communication about actions and intentions
- Avoiding misleading table talk during hands
- Truthful responses to direct questions when answering is permitted
Chip Stack Transparency
Honesty regarding your chip stack is not merely an ethical consideration but often an explicit rule in poker ethics rooms.
Proper Chip Stack Practices
- Clearly displaying large denomination chips at the front or top of stacks
- Providing honest counts when asked
- Keeping chips on the table and visible at all times
- Organized stacks that can be visually estimated 1
Most poker ethics rooms specifically require players to place their largest-denomination chips in clearly visible positions, either at the front of the stack or on top, making it easier for opponents to assess the true stack size. 1
Collusion and Team Play
Perhaps the most serious ethical violation in poker ethics is collusion—two or more players secretly working together against others.
Forms of Collusion
- Soft playing – Failing to bet or raise against partners
- Chip dumping – Deliberately losing chips to partners
- Information sharing – Signaling or communicating about holdings
- Squeeze plays – Coordinating raises to extract maximum value from other players
- Whipsawing – Executing planned raising patterns to build pots
Collusion isn’t just unethical—it’s explicitly against the rules in all poker ethics rooms and online platforms, potentially resulting in lifetime bans and even legal consequences.
Tilt Management as Ethical Responsibility
Controlling emotional reactions isn’t merely strategic—it’s an ethical obligation to maintain table atmosphere.
Ethical Responses to Bad Beats
- Avoiding verbal abuse toward players or dealers
- Refraining from physical demonstrations of anger
- Not discussing bad beats extensively at the table 1
- Maintaining respectful language regardless of results
World-renowned poker ethics coach Tommy Angelo suggests: “Your ethical obligation extends to how you handle losing. Berating dealers or other players creates a toxic environment that harms the game. The most respected players maintain their composure regardless of results.”
The Self-Regulated Integrity of Poker
Poker’s ethical framework largely relies on community standards rather than rigid enforcement. Players who consistently violate these unwritten rules may find themselves unwelcome in games, excluded from private opportunities, and developing reputations that follow them throughout their poker ethics careers.
The most respected players in poker ethics history are known not just for their technical skills but for their integrity at the tables. By adhering to poker’s ethical code, you contribute to the game’s continued growth and health while building a reputation that opens doors to the best games and opportunities.
Remember that poker’s ethical standards aren’t arbitrary restrictions—they’re the foundation that allows a game of partial information and deception to function with integrity. As you develop your poker skills, give equal attention to developing your ethical approach to the game.
Check out this next blog:
